Impact of two decades of humanitarian and development assistance and the projected mortality consequences of current defunding to 2030: retrospective evaluation and forecasting analysis.

Impact of two decades of humanitarian and development assistance and the projected mortality consequences of current defunding to 2030: retrospective evaluation and forecasting analysis.

Publication date: May 01, 2026

Official development assistance (ODA) accounts for the majority of humanitarian and development assistance in the world’s most vulnerable countries and has played a pivotal role in advancing global health. We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the impact of ODA funding on mortality across the past two decades, and to project the potential consequences of current defunding trends. We conducted an integrated retrospective evaluation and forecasting analysis using longitudinal panel data from 93 low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). First, we estimated the association between ODA per-capita funding and mortality outcomes from 2002 to 2021 using a two-ways fixed-effects multivariable Poisson regression model with robust standard errors, adjusted for all relevant demographic, socioeconomic, and health-system covariates. We then assessed age-specific and cause-specific effects, performing extensive sensitivity and triangulation analyses to test the robustness and causal interpretation of results. Finally, we integrated the retrospective impact estimates into validated country-level microsimulation models to forecast mortality under three defunding scenarios up to 2030: a business-as-usual trajectory, a severe defunding scenario, and a mild defunding scenario. Higher ODA funding levels were associated with a 23% reduction in age-standardised all-cause mortality (rate ratio [RR] 0.77; 95% CI 0.70-0.85) and a 39% reduction in under-5 mortality (0.61; 0.49-0.75). ODA funding was associated with large mortality declines in major communicable diseases: 70% for HIV/AIDS (RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.24-0.39), 56% for malaria (0.44; 0.35-0.56), 56% for nutritional deficiencies (0.44; 0.30-0.65), and 54% for neglected tropical diseases (0.46; 0.36-0.59). Significant reductions were also observed in mortality from tuberculosis, diarrhoeal diseases, lower respiratory infections, and maternal and perinatal causes. Forecasting analyses projected that ongoing reductions in ODA funding could, under a severe defunding scenario, result in 22.6 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 16.3-29.3) additional deaths across all ages by 2030, including 5.4 million (4.1-6.8) among children younger than 5 years. Under a mild defunding scenario-defined as a continuation of current downward trends-the projected excess deaths would be 9.4 million (95% UI 6.2-12.6) overall and 2.5 million (1.8-3.2) among children younger than 5 years. ODA funding has played a decisive role in reducing preventable mortality across LMICs over the past two decades, and the abrupt withdrawal of this support threatens to cause millions of avoidable deaths, reversing decades of progress in global health. RF Catalytic Capital and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation.

Open Access PDF

Concepts Keywords
Decades Adolescent
Humanitarian Adult
Spanish Altruism
Test Child
Tuberculosis Child, Preschool
Developing Countries
Female
Forecasting
Global Health
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Male
Middle Aged
Mortality
Retrospective Studies
Young Adult

Semantics

Type Source Name
disease MESH communicable diseases
disease MESH AIDS
disease MESH malaria
pathway KEGG Malaria
disease MESH nutritional deficiencies
disease MESH neglected tropical diseases
disease MESH tuberculosis
pathway KEGG Tuberculosis
disease MESH respiratory infections

Original Article

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *